Canada looking good

Compared to the USA, we are looking quite good in the markets today (9/29/09).
The USA dollar has slipped internationally and the CDN $ has improved to over $.920 US.
I have been watching some CDN MFs (including ETFs) the last few weeks and like how they are doing.
MFs have done quite well since March and I am wondering if it is time to buy Canadian ... or is it a W recovery and the second dip is coming ... good time for younger risk takers.
Here are the results (as per the Financial Post) after today's TSX close.
"Canada's benchmark index was on track to post a second day in positive territory as the close approached Tuesday, with the lion's share of the gains attributable to gold stocks.

The S&P/TSX was up 53.29 points, or 0.47 per cent, to 11,392.01 at the close, driven by the materials sub-index and a surge in gold shares.

Kinross Gold was up more than four per cent on the day after announcing Tuesday it would boost production at its mines in South America by about 57 per cent in the next five years. Goldcorp rose 3.4 per cent and Barrick Gold was also up 2.9 per cent as the price of gold closed at $994.40 U.S. an ounce, up 30 cents.

The price of crude oil fell Tuesday, closing at $66.71 U.S. a barrel, down 13 cents.

The Canadian dollar was up 24 basis points to 92.19 cents U.S. in late-afternoon trading.

Economic news on Tuesday included a report from the Conference Board of Canada that the level of consumer confidence in the country was up for the seventh month in a row, to its highest level since April 2008.

The same could not be said of confidence levels in the U.S., where they were reported Tuesday to have fallen unexpectedly in August.

The Dow Jones industrial average was unable to shake off that data, falling 46.25 points, or 0.47 per cent, to 9,743.11 by the close Tuesday. The Nasdaq composite index was also down 6.7 points, or 0.31 per cent, to 2,124.04.

The main European markets were down Tuesday, while Asian markets posted gains.

© The Financial Post"

Not often seen in the sports world

(left-click to enlarge)
Tiger Woods continues to impress me. 
In the Toronto Star Saturday Sept 25th.
I don't know of another instance where a top competitor gave advice to another top competitor during a competition.

Diesel vs gasoline

Most people agree it is environmentally important to focus on non-fossil fuel car engines NOW. 
This aside, we will continue to buy fossil fuel burning automobiles as long as economically feasible.
How long can we (the planet) afford to continue to refine gasoline and diesel engines? 
I had always thought gasoline was less harmful to the environment than diesel.

I have always thought generation of biofuels was energy expensive. 

Here are two very interesting charts showing lifecycle GHG reduction from biofuels displacing fossil fuels and producers of CO2 in the USA. Biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel) are the way to go in the near future, as they produce much less CO2 and will become the fuel of choice (as fossil fuels are depleted).

However, HEVs (hybrid electric vehicle) and EVs (electric vehicle)  engines will produce significantly less emissions and are the longer short-term solution. Hydrogen fuel cell engines will be an even better solution as they produce NO emissions (but do cause emissions in their current production methods).CO2 is, by far, the greatest contributor to GHGs (approx 85%) in the USA.

While we continue to buy gas and diesel fuel, we should understand which is less harmful to the environment (generates less lifecycle greenhouse gas emission (GHG)).

Here is a list of the most environmentally friendly automobiles for 2009. Hybrids and FFVs (flex fuel vehicles using 85% ethanol) lead the chart at this time. Check here for your vehicle or next purchase.

A diesel engine doesn't appear until around number 42. Biodiesel automobiles don't appear in the list as they are not yet available in Canada. 

Here is the list of diesel cars available in Canada. These are clean diesel (see below) engines and their CO2 output is greater than FFVs, gas hytbrids and a few small gasoline engines ... but comparable to the larger gas engine vehicles. The diesel engines, prior to clean diesel technology, were much worse environmentally than gas engines. Previous diesel engines produced more CO2 and NOx than gas engines. Previous diesel engines produce more NOx than gasoline engines. 
Diesel engines have advanced in the last few years and now use clean diesel technology (the ones in the chart above). Mercedes-Benz BlueTec (car engine) and AdBlue (truck engine) are examples.

Clean diesel technology utilizes a catalytic converter to convert all NOx into nitrogen and water only. The clean diesel engine is now comparable to the larger non-hybrid and non-biofuel gasoline engine in lifecycle GHG reduction. 

What will happen in the future?

In my opinion, from a GHG perspective, fossil fuel HEVs with biofuels will overtake FFVs, if the price of fossil fuels doesn't increase too quickly. EVs will take over, if fossil fuel prices increase dramatically, more efficient batteries are developed, and the hydrogen fuel cell isn't ready. Eventually, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles will become the clear winner.

British Car Meet in Oakville

 (left-click to enlarge)

I have been looking at 1957-62 Triumph TR3As the last couple of weeks, as I had owned a 1960 in the late 60s. Unfortunately, what I am seeing are too expensive ... but they are very nice.

As well, I saw a few MGAs that really impressed me. These are really quite impressive and quite expensive to buy.


As well, I have been thinking of downsizing to something like a Mazda MX-5 or a year old hybrid (very hard to find at a reasonable price).

Here is a 2008 convertible I checked out in Oakville ... more reasonably priced.